PANEL REGIMEN: Crisis as Transition Tools in society, politics and international relations

Crisis events have long been recognized as catalysts for change and transition in various aspects of society, politics, and international relations. These crises create a sense of urgency and necessitate immediate attention, leading to the reformulation of ideas and the transformation of institutions (Brodziak et al., 2017). Political scientists argue that crises compel leaders to make high-stakes decisions under conditions of threat, uncertainty, and time pressure, resulting in political repercussions and the restructuring of domestic and international institutions (Castells, 2005). Crisis can also be used as a conservative tool by regimes to justify authoritarian measures and preserve their power. In times of crisis, governments often exploit fear and uncertainty to expand executive powers, infringe on civil liberties, and suppress opposition under the pretext of maintaining stability and national security. History is replete with examples of crises being exploited by regimes to consolidate their authority and prolong their rule (Chan, 2013). Therefore, it is essential to critically analyze the differential impact of crises on governance and the potential manipulation of crises for political ends. This panel should be open to contributions that explore the multifaceted role of crises in society, politics, and international relations.
This panel welcomes research on how crises serve as drivers of change and transition, prompting reforms and reshaping institutions. Additionally, it encourages examination of how crises can be wielded by political actors to justify authoritarian measures and consolidate power. Contributions may delve into historical precedents, contemporary case studies, and theoretical frameworks to understand the complexities of crisis dynamics and their implications for governance and political transitions.