The onset of the 21st century has brought about a period of global affairs characterized by notable transformations that defy straightforward forecasts and question the fundamental principles of global governance. The rise of China as a prominent global power is causing significant disruptions to traditional power structures, presenting a considerable challenge to the liberal legal system that emerged after World War II. The growing prominence of China in international institutions and its forceful foreign policy underscore the shifting dynamics of global power, which calls for a reassessment of international governance frameworks. The usage of terminologies such as de-globalization, slowbalization, and de-risking indicates an understanding of the complex dynamics of the 21st century. Nevertheless, the term "disorder" fails to accurately encompass this ever-changing global environment's intricacies. This paper contends that the disorder narrative is inadequate in elucidating the current condition of global events, specifically in the realm of International Law. Traditional linear methodologies in International Law face difficulties in effectively addressing intricate and unforeseeable shifts in power dynamics, interconnected problems, and the emergence of multiple actors with varying viewpoints. To enhance comprehension of these intricate phenomena, this study proposes embracing the chaotic paradigm rooted in chaos theory. This shift recognizes the inherent intricacy, volatility, and lack of a clear pattern in the international system, resulting from its anarchic nature. To analyze this change, the research utilizes a case study methodology, with a specific emphasis on China as a representative example. Examining China's ascent employs the notion of path dependence, exploring crucial junctures and historical events that have influenced the present global framework. The objective is to reveal an underlying organization within the chaotic global system, demonstrating that China's rise is a component of a broader framework.
Type
Open Panel
Language
English
Chair
Discussants
Description
Onsite Presentation Language
Same as proposal language
Panel ID
PL-6094