Quantitative Analysis of Middle East Politics

It is frequently observed that the discourse and debate surrounding Middle Eastern politics is closely associated with the political stance of the speaker. Some have articulated apprehension regarding the prevalence of violence in the Middle East, proposing that it be confronted through decisive measures. Others have put forth a more nuanced approach, emphasizing the necessity of comprehending the historical context and the underlying motivations behind the violence. In the field of Middle Eastern politics, where it is often assumed that commentators should espouse a political stance, how can political scientists contribute to the discourse? In this panel, we will temporarily set aside our own political stances and approach the discourse space of Middle Eastern politics, namely public opinion and media information, employing the scientific methods of political science. Furthermore, the discussion will be examined from the vantage point of comparative politics, with due consideration given to the objectivity of the research methods and the reproducibility of political issues.
Our research subjects include Turkey, where authoritarianism is on the rise; the monarchies of the Gulf states; Israel, where public opinion is divided over judicial reform; and Hamas and Hezbollah, which are in danger of extinction due to the war with Israel. The research was conducted using highly objective research methods, including quantitative text analysis, survey experiments, and other quantitative methods.