Paradoxes in Anti-Corruption Governance

This panel examines the complexities and unintended consequences of anti-corruption efforts in diverse governance contexts. It explores how anti-corruption measures interact with political systems, institutional frameworks, and economic environments, often revealing paradoxes that challenge conventional approaches to combating corruption. It is aimed to bring together research that explores the dynamics of enforcement selectivity, institutional resistance, and the interplay between corruption and democratic stability. It also promotes a debate on how administrative structures, legal frameworks, and international norms shape the design and implementation of anti-corruption strategies, influencing their outcomes and effectiveness. Through a blend of theoretical perspectives and empirical insights, the panel highlights the challenges of aligning anti-corruption initiatives with broader governance goals, such as transparency, accountability, and institutional integrity. It raises critical questions about the balance between flexibility and rigour in reforms, the role of political will, and the impact of corruption on public trust and institutional legitimacy. This panel seeks to advance understanding of anti-corruption governance by addressing its multifaceted nature, fostering dialogue on innovative approaches, and identifying pathways to overcome systemic obstacles in diverse contexts.